Home > Windows 10 > Quick Discussion Of Native RAID 0 Support In Windows 10

Quick Discussion Of Native RAID 0 Support In Windows 10

Contents

It is simpler, offers better performance, makes less noise and uses less power. Posted on 2012-10-13 17:45:53 Montrose439 Your case of having 6 % probability of failure on one of two disks is proven wrong, when probability exceeds 100 percent(for example 50 drives times Stay logged in Welcome to Windows 10 Forums! I don't know if it is technologically easy to do though and I can't wait for it to happen. http://phpbbinstallers.net/windows-10/quick-windows-10-upgrade-question.html

There's a Storage Spaces lookalike on the Windows side called DrivePool by a company called StableBit, and while I haven't played with the product myself, it seems to work in a similar manner My Computer You need to have JavaScript enabled so that you can use this ... One of them is stored at my parents house and during each visit I swap them out so I always have an off-site backup. Allow me to suggest that if it was then neither you nor Western Digital could conduct business...;) So what *is* the risk that *a* drive will fail, regardless of how many https://www.tenforums.com/drivers-hardware/69025-quick-discussion-native-raid-0-support-windows-10-a.html

Windows 10 Storage Spaces Vs Raid

The SSD is plugged in the Intel Controller set up in RAID mode but of course is not in RAID. Please note that with HDD the RAID conversion within Windows may take one or more hours depending on the size of the volume. if you can grasp the massiveness of such headroom. And without a doubt, some awesome options exist on the Linux side.

Any disk you want included in your RAID you need to delete them from the top area of disk management. Polls Archive Advertising A cookie is used to collect visitor statistics. I wanted to know if Storage Spaces allows me to recover data from failed arrays in the same manner that my favorite RAID-1 technology offers. Raid 6 the language used is very easy and understandable.

I obviously will want something thats fast, but reliable. Windows Storage Spaces Performance You'll be able to ask questions about Windows 10 or chat with the community and help others. During this event (and after buying two drives), I realized that Windows Backup backs up your entire system, including all installed programs. https://www.windows10forums.com/threads/restoring-from-system-image-to-raid-0.6056/ Please turn JavaScript back on and reload this page.

that type of setup would be great for testing purposes, (not for speed obviously), if you are lacking resources. If none of the above ones i linked will suffice, i wouldnt mind just going to newegg. With RAID6 two disks can die simultaneously. I do not believe, thankfully, that this is way things work...;) If things worked this way in reality, well, all of us would have a very tough time finding anything that

Windows Storage Spaces Performance

But I'm up for any challenge from Redmond. High NTFS feature parity. There are some aspects not to like about ReFS, but in general, as Sinofsky wrote, ReFS builds upon the same foundation that NTFS uses which means API level Windows 10 Storage Spaces Vs Raid While the RAID concepts of mirroring and striping are used within Storage Spaces, the implementation is optimized for minimized user complexity, maximized flexibility in physical disk utilization and allocation, and fast Windows 10 Storage Spaces Improvements This post isn't to advance my opinion--it's to simply demonstrate that RAID 0 doesn't bother Microsoft, either.

This makes it easy to turn your existing spare hard drives into massive storage or even redundant backups. his comment is here You can put other data on that partition but it apparently more common to use a separate partition. We use our documentation as per reference in order to provide technical recommendations but, we don't have a way to confirm that your product will respond the same way to our The premature nature of dynamic drive pooling in Windows, coupled with the arguably inferior file system NTFS, was the perfect storm for showing Drive Extender the door. Refs

If one drive has a 1.72% chance of failure, then if you have two drives, your chance of failure on one of the drives doubles. If you are reading or writing a large amount of data at one location on the disk, that is where you will see a benefit. Also the 6Gb per second Sata 3 transfer rate only applies to sequential reads, which are faster than random reads, particularly on rotating media. http://phpbbinstallers.net/windows-10/quick-question-about-uefi-before-installing-windows-10.html Latest Articles Hide New Edge Button Trouble posted Mar 31, 2017 at 12:27 AM Change DPI Scaling Ian posted Mar 29, 2017 How to Uninstall Applications in Windows 10 Ian posted

Like Show 0 Likes(0) Actions 3. Going native whenever possible with software solutions is always ideal in my eyes. More to the point--did you know that Windows 10 natively supports RAID 0?

Alienware OSD and Alienware Command Center should be installed as the last two items on your fresh Windows install.

You're right that looking at MTBF is another way of approaching it, but it is just another way of saying the same thing. The events are not mutually exclusive, i.e. I thought it was interesting that this article refers to the motherboard RAID controller as "software" RAID; if that's the case then Windows RAID should be just as good. Long file names and large volume sizes.

I'm hoping that Microsoft can get the speed of such parity arrays raised, since my tests proved the option to be a pretty pitiful alternative to a RAID-5 setup which would I'm sorry, as I just don't have enough genuine experience with the native Windows System Image process, as I use Acronis True Image for all my disk imaging and backup needs.Click What I know is that since it is so easy to pop an SSD laptop or tablet to look something up online in a sec and put it back to sleep navigate here Pop open the computer management console, run the Disk Management program and let the fun begin.

It offers features such as hot-plugging and native command queuing (NCQ). This is good for temporary scratch spaces like video editing scenarios. There could be more than a few factors at play here, and I'm sure storage geeks will nitpick my findings. If you have a RAID controller on your $150 motherboard, what does that say about the quality?

With 2 disks, selecting RAID 1+0 effectively gives you a RAID 1 set. I use RAID5 for data storage, and I purposely mix brands (but not too much so they still work) so that they don't all have the same MTBF. (I'm using Infrant Video editing is a good example of when RAID0 might make sense. My Computer Computer Type: PC/Desktop System Manufacturer/Model Number: Fujitsu Esprimo P956 E94+ OS: Windows 10 Pro X64 CPU: Intel I7 6700 Motherboard: D-3402 Memory: 64 Gb Graphics Card: Intel HD 530

Thanks.. Quote waltc View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Member Posts : 379 10x64 New 07 Nov 2016 #3 M4v3r1ck said: AMEN! Test 1: Storage Spaces Reliability in the Face of Failed Drives No matter how well a storage array performs, if my data won't be safe from drive failure in a real In either or possibly both instances, you may be stuck with....

What if you could leverage all the cool benefits that RAID arrays and SAN backbones offer, at a sliver of the cost of a true SAN? And this proposition isn't only meant for the enterprise. This means that those disks do not use a specific RAID level and acts as stand-alone disks. A good raid controller starts at $300.

About a year ago was when I got my first glimpse of what Storage Spaces had to offer. The point of this article is that I'm saying that for desktop users, the other downsides of poor RAID implementation outweigh those benefits. The internal bay I am using is this one: https://www.jacobsparts.com/items/HDDBAY-01/ Here is the external enclosure I am using for my BluRay burner: 5.25" USB 2.0 CD/DVD Slim Notebook External SATA Drive Do not take on the hassles of RAID unless you know it will be a help.

I agree totally, that a single disk = RAID0 of two disks regarding they both have an equal risk of failure in the case one gets lost. One disk is all you need for this, but using two or more is really where this would shine. and I can't simulate an environment to be able to test 6 drives. Reply Laurens says: July 27, 2016 at 8:58 pm I'm no Time Machine user myself but according to a few web sites I checked it is not absolutely necessary to use